Senior 2: Developing Louisa

Question: Are any of the characters a developing character, changing over time?  Explain how the character changed in the story. (What were they like before? What were they like after?  Who or what changed them?)  Was the change a large or a small change?  Is the change believable for the character in his/her situation?

 

In the book  Me Before You, the main developing character in the novel is Louisa Clark.  Louisa has dealt with a lot  in her life. She comes from a low income working class family that lives in a small house and losing her job. also before becoming the quirky awkward Louisa we know in the book she actually tells the reader “I dressed normally in those days. Or, should I say, I dressed like the other girls in town–long hair, flicked over the shoulder, indigo jeans, T-shirts tight enough to show off our tiny waists and high breasts… And I had ideas. Things I would do”(173)   later on in the book she tells  Will how she was raped in the maze between her home and Traynors castle.This event changed her whole lifestyle and appearance .Also Throughout the story Louisa realizes how much love she is capable of giving to one person.

Moyes, Jojo. Me Before You. New York, N.Y: Pamela Dorman Books/Viking, 2012. Print.

Senior 2: Love sometimes conquers nothing..

question: What symbols does the author use?  What do these symbols represent?  How do you know?  

 

In the book Me Before You , Author  Jojo Moyes symbolizes that sometimes the phrase “Love conquers all” isn’t always the truth.  In the book  William Traynor who is tragically paralyzed when struck by  a vehicle falls in love with his caretaker Louisa Clark. Although William was given love and support by those around him like Louisa,His mother,and his nurse Nathan. Will felt he could never be happy again or live his life like he wanted to. Ultimately Traynor wanted to kill himself to give Louisa the chance to truly live her life and to finally be at peace.  Having known his intention Louisa wanted to in her own way save him from himself by attempting to show him how much more to life there was. all her attempts in her mind seemed to be working they seemed happy  together. Will seemed happy but that was not that case at all on their candle light dinner on the beach on their vacation William told Louisa what he intended to do. Louisa broke down no amount of words, trips ,dates, cups of tea ,or anything was gonna change that. In the book Louisa Clark says “I told him I loved him. And he just said it wasn’t enough. How am I supposed to live with that?”(337)  Clark was in aw that she wasn’t able to change his mind. She thought that her plan would work, Louisa thought it was working. but evidently it did not because Will went through and killed himself . Proving that love sometimes doesn’t always solve every issue, proving that love doesn’t always conquer all. eventually Louisa Clark was able to make peace with his choice and try and live a happy life.

Moyes, Jojo. Me Before You. New York, N.Y: Pamela Dorman Books/Viking, 2012. Print.

Senior 2:Happiness in Death

Question:What is a “conflict” in literature? What is the main conflict in your book? How does the ending resolve (or not resolve) the main conflict? (Is the ending happy, unhappy, or indeterminate?) Was the ending an appropriate ending

 

Conflict in literature is in issue in books between usually one ore more characters in the novel, it usually the driving issue used in the book.

Having read the the cover of the book, the back ,and reviews on line I figured Me Before You would be the usual corny sappy love story with its dramatic cliche love story issues that would eventually be solved in the ending with the usual mushy love stuff. Let me just say I was terribly wrong.  The driving conflict in the book to me seemed to be Louisa Clark trying to get through to William Traynor as his caretaker and eventually slipping and falling in love with him. After Traynor’s accident he was not the same he had lost all hope an joy in life.  Will with his disability didn’t think he could ever possibly  be as happy as he once was before. Louisa Clark from the moment she met him almost tried to do anything she could to make William as happy as he once was before everything happened to him. Louisa did everything she could from trips to concerts but nothing seemed to be enough for William. William would have rather been dead than continue living life the way he had too, literally. William couldn’t stand being the way he was any longer so he decided to basically kill himself, and Louisa’s undying love for Traynor couldn’t stop him. Will thought that if he wasn’t there Louisa Clark could live  a better life. This showed on page 367 of  Me Before You: I am conscious that knowing me has caused you pain, and grief, and I hope that one day when you are less angry with me and less upset you will see not just that I could only have done the thing that I did, but also that this will help you live a really good life, a better life, than if you hadn’t met me.”  William thought this would be the best thing he could possibly do for himself and everyone else around him  especially  Louisa. In the end William got what he wanted and he died leaving Louisa.  This ending seemed appropriate for the book, it set it apart from the rest of the corny love novels that would have ended it with Louisa and William living happily after. The choice to leave Traynor’s mind unchanged and killing him in the end was  bold and different and I applaud  Jojo Moyes for that.

Moyes, Jojo. Me Before You. New York, N.Y: Pamela Dorman Books/Viking, 2012. Print.

Senior 2:Love and Tragedy..

Question:What is the theme of your book?  (How do you know?)  Before you read the book, what did you think about this subject? Did reading this book give you a new insight or deepen what you already know about this theme?

Image result for Me before you  love

While reading the book Me Before You by Jojo Moyes I quickly recognized the theme of this book was love. I guessed this from the cover of the book and hearing the things about the movie. As I read It came clear that the theme was more than just love, it was love mixed with drama and tragedy. I knew  tragedy would be a big role in the book when while reading the prologue  the main character William Traynor’s life was changed when  he was struck by a vehicle. The accident Tragically turned Traynor into a paraplegic, which was very hard for him to adjust to given the fact that he could be seen as an adventurer who lived life on the edge and now cannot even bathe himself. After the accident Traynor didn’t have much to be happy about. he lost his girlfriend to his best friend and all seemed lost for William. Until a quirky twenty-six year old Louisa Clark came along as Traynors newest caretaker.  It took awhile for William  to warm up to Louisa after many failed attempts made by her to get him to open up and be friendly with her, Will finally came around. Louisa Clark and William Traynor built a very strong relationship and feelings for one another. Even in the midst of William finally coming out to Louisa about him making the decision to essentially kill himself, Clark still expressed her deep love for William  with saying things in the book  Me before you like: “All I can say is that you make me… you make me into someone I couldn’t even imagine. You make me happy, even when you’re awful. I would rather be with you – even the you that you seem to think is diminished – than with anyone else in the world.”(324). Through the pain of losing the love of her life Louisa was still able to muster up the words to let William know that he was loved and despite what may happen or happened previously in his life that he was loved. reading this book gave me a deeper insight on just how passionate love can be and it even has the power to give someone who feels like they have lost everything a little bit of joy whether it’s just temporary or for life.

Moyes, Jojo. Me Before You. New York, N.Y: Pamela Dorman Books/Viking, 2012. Print.

song of solomon

Once he believed that the sight of her mouth on the dead man’s fingers would be the thing he would remember always” (16).

“Once he believed that the sight of her mouth on the dead man’s fingers would be the thing he would remembeQuestion: How does the setting in the novel relate to our world? How is it different?

Macon Dead III, Milkman, starts as a selfish, and non family oriented man, but throughout the book he develops morals, and a sense of selflessness, which is a huge change from his original character. Milkman is raised with a sense of materialism, probably aiding in the development of his original character towards the beginning of the book.

This is shown when Milkman’s father tells him “Boy, you got better things to do with your time. Besides, it’s time you started learning how to work. You start Monday. After school come to my office; work a couple of hours there and learn what’s real. Pilate can’t teach you a thing you can use in this world. Maybe the next, but not this one. Let me tell you right now the one important thing you’ll ever need to know: Own things. And let the things you own own other things. Then you’ll own yourself and other people too. StartingMonday, I’m going to teach you how” (55).

Macon dead tells his son right of the bat that you need to work, you need to make money, and you need stuff. This was destructive in the development of Milkman’s character and values. Another example of Milkman being molded into selfish is demonstrated when he Guitar Bains, a childhood friend, are having a conversation, “How come it can’t fly no better than a chicken? Milkman asked. Too much tail. All that jewelry weighs it down. Like vanity. Can’t nobody fly with all that shit. Wanna fly, you got to give up the shit that weighs you down” (179). At this point in the book guitar and Milkman see a peacock, which can’t really fly, in Milkman’s inquiry about the bird Guitar teaches him that you must let things and people go in order to succeed.

Luckily Milkman changes, which I feel is needed to be done because somebody who does not have morals makes me question their humanity. An example of the person Milkman changes into is shown when Morrison writes, “Guitar looked at the cookie again, then back into Milkman’s eyes. Nothing changed in his face. Milkman knew it sounded lame. It was the truth, but it sounded like a lie. A weak lie too. He also knew that in all his life, Guitar had never seen Milkman give anybody a hand, especially a stranger; he also knew that they’d even discussed it, starting with Milkman’s not coming to his mother’s rescue in a dream he had. Guitar had accused him of selfishness and indifference; told him he wasn’t serious, and didn’t have any fellow feeling—none whatsoever. Now he was standing there saying that he willingly, spontaneously, had helped an old white man lift a huge, heavy crate. But it was true. It was true. And he’d prove it.” Guitar, Milkman’s best friend, was bewildered when Milkman told him he had helped an old white man. A man with a background of selfishness has suddenly decided to show compassion, willingly, despite previous moments in his life where he chose to not help his own mother.

The sudden change in scenery caught me off guard. I was happy to see Milkman’s transition, in my opinion, into more of a human being. I thought of the saying old dogs can’t learn new tricks. Milkman’s change discredited this belief for me.

Work Cited

Morrison, Toni. Song of Solomon. New York: Knopf, 1977. Print.r

The setting of Song of Solomon relates to a past world, not mine, or anybody younger than forty, but it does show a world people once lived in. The book spans through Milkman’s life, it explains his exploits and experiences from 1931 to around 1963. An important historical series of events that appeared in the book is the Civil Rights movement, which began in 1955. Milkman lives in a world full of racism and prejudice, which real people faced during this time period. Milkman, Freddie, the janitor, among others have a discussion after finding out about the death of Emmett till, an African American teenager who was lynched for whistling at a white woman. In the book there is a scene in which Milkman finds out about the death of Emmett Till. The reaction to this is both anger and humor.

The author writes, “what you mean, ‘where’? I got five says it’ll be in the morning paper. On the sports page? asked Hospital Tommy. Or on the funny pages said Nero Brown. No, man. Front page. I bet five dollars on front page. What the fuck is the difference? shouted Guitar. A kid is stomped and you standin round fussin about whether some cracker put it in the paper. He stomped, ain’t he? Dead, ain’t he? Cause he whistled at some Scarlett O’Hara cunt ” (80-81). While Hospital Tommy and Nero Brown are focused on whether the lynching would be put in the paper, Guitar is steaming at the fact that they are arguing over something so minuscule. The real reason they are talking about this, is because a boy was badly beaten and killed for whistling at a White woman. This is why Guitar gets so upset when Tommy and Brown are subtly joking about it being in the paper. The author tied an historical event into the lives of the characters. For this reason the novel relates to our world very deeply.

Work Cited

Morrison, Toni. Song of Solomon. New York: Knopf, 1977. Print.

Question: Is the main conflict between sharply differentiated good and evil, or is it more subtle and complex? Sharply differentiated means that it is easy to see the contrast and the characters are clearly good or evil.

The book explains how Dead once had great love for his family, leaving me to believe that he was fundamentally good. Songs are musical compositions that usher in a sense of joy and happiness, Song of Solomon sings a dark tune of hatred and discontent. Macon Dead, a wealthy African American man, sings this sad tune. Macon Dead III is born February 19th, a day after his mother was the first black person admitted to Mercy Hospital, because a man had jumped of the roof claiming he could fly and died.Question: Is the main conflict between sharply differentiated good and evil, or is it more subtle and complex? Sharply differentiated means that it is easy to see the contrast and the characters are clearly good or evil.

The book is written very subtly, it gives you hints as you read it does not spell everything out for you. For example, Dead got his name from his father, Macon Dead Jr., who got his name from his illiterate father who got his name from a drunken Union Soldier who signed his name incorrectly on Macon’s identification papers. This information was presented in a very complex fashion, and as a result was hard to read for me.

It is hard to tell whether Dead is evil or good. The book explains how Dead once had great love for his family, leaving me to believe that he was fundamentally good. An example, of Dead’s love for his family is is demonstrated when the author, Toni Morrison, writes, “Once he believed that the sight of her mouth on the dead man’s fingers would be the thing he would remember always” (16). Dead once thought that his wife’s lips would be something that would always linger in his mind.The book explains how Dead once had great love for his family, leaving me to believe that he was fundamentally good. Songs are musical compositions that usher in a sense of joy and happiness, Song of Solomon sings a dark tune of hatred and discontent. Macon Dead, a wealthy African American man, sings this sad tune. Macon Dead III is born February 19th, a day after his mother was the first black person admitted to Mercy Hospital, because a man had jumped of the roof claiming he could fly and died.

The book is written very subtly, it gives you hints as you read it does not spell everything out for you. For example, Dead got his name from his father, Macon Dead Jr., who got his name from his illiterate father who got his name from a drunken Union Soldier who signed his name incorrectly on Macon’s identification papers. This information was presented in a very complex fashion, and as a result was hard to read for me.

It is hard to tell whether Dead is evil or good. The book explains how Dead once had great love for his family, leaving me to believe that he was fundamentally good. An example, of Dead’s love for his family is demonstrated when the author writes, “Once he believed that the sight of her mouth on the dead man’s fingers would be the thing he would remember always” (16). Dead once thought that his wife’s lips would be something that would always linger in his mind. Dead III faces conflict with his father, Dead II, when Freddie, the janitor catches Ruth breastfeeding Dead III when he is much too old. Ruth kept these moments with her son a secret for fear of judgment. With this Dead III develops a nickname, Milkman. Most people are either too afraid or don’t care enough to approach Milkman’s father. His father hears the name and has some idea of where it had come from, but instead of confronting Ruth, he keeps his knowledge of his wife’s “bonding time”, with milkman, a secret ushering Dead III into a deeper period of hatred for his family.

Work Cited

Morrison, Toni. Song of Solomon. New York: Knopf, 1977. Print.

Truth

Question: Does the theme give you a new insight or deepen what you already know?

 

The theme of this book gave me a new insight to appreciate those I have around me I actually care about because I or them can be taken away from one another at any given moment. The Theme showed me that not every day is promised and that there are people in the world who leave the house some mornings and never see their family friends or loved ones ever again. It deepened the fact that I already knew I had it good but I didn’t really know how good I had it until reading this book ( that by the way was a true story). It opened my eyes more the real problems and real situations that happen and it showed me just how crazy things really are getting in the world today. Especially even more so because this really happened, and it was not something some had just sat down at a computer or in front of some paper and typed or wrote it. This was actually someone’s son, grandson, or friend that these people would never get to speak see or hug again ever in their lives. This book saddened me and gave me more insight  to cherish my loved ones and to not take anyone in my life for granted and to appreciate just how good I have it. The crazy thing is no matter how rich, poor, ugly ,beautiful, young, or old death and tragedy can strike at any time or any point in someone’s life. This book showed me that, and it also showed me that there is not anything anyone can do about it to change it.

 

Point of view

Question: What are the advantages to the author’s chosen point of view?

 

             Throughout the book I feel Like the authors chosen point of view of telling the story in a day in a life kind of situation showing the young boys last days alive was a big advantage and a great way to grasp a reader. If the book was written any other way I do not think I would have read it all the way through because it probably would not have been as interesting and nail biting as it was. I feel like by writing it the way he did was aimed to capture a younger audience of kids and people who enjoy reading books on crime, drugs, money, and sex. Through this point of view he was able to give an insight of what could have possibly been on Zac’s mind as a person kidnapped and held for ransom and introduced to things like weed and money and guns. From this point of view we were lead on like Zac was. Tricked to believe that everything was going to be ok and that they were his friends and nothing was going to happen and he was going to just go home and have his life back in a few days, but no. None of that was true as much as we wanted it to be as the story progressed and things got deeper Johnny trueloves true intentions of killing him came to light and by that time it was to late because we were already won over it was to late because we were already dead. I feel as though this Point of view worked perfectly for the book

Alpha Dog

Alpha Dog is a book inspired by the true events When southern California drug lord johnny truelove conspired the kidnapping and murder of  one of his clientele’s younger brother in order to settle a score of an unpaid debt. This book kept me on edge the entire way through and tied my heart into knots. True Love was like an Al Capone of a modern generation who had built a lucrative career in dealing drugs and circuiting them through California. When reading author/Director  Nick Cassavetes book in the final days of young teen Zac Masurski I felt as

If I was there through all the drugs and sex I felt as if I knew this boy personally. In so many ways I felt for and related to him in so many ways with issues with his parents and the feeling of being lost and not knowing what my purpose was. My stomach dropped and was confused and wondered how human beings could be so cruel and take someone so young  who has so much more left to experience in life and kill him. After a while I forgot this was a real story and not fiction because of how well young Masurski was treated seeing that he was a “hostage”, but as the story went on it was a rouse in order to butter the boy up so he wouldn’t run away and rat them out. This book made me cherish what I have and who I have in my Life. It was a very interesting story that showed just how real issues like drugs rape and murder in California and just how far people would go to settle a score or for a little bit of money. Would definitely read again and recommend it for others.

The End

Question: Is the ending happy, unhappy, or indeterminate (just ends, leaves you hanging, the conflict is not clearly resolved). Is the ending the appropriate ending for this book?

 

For the first time In Ever a book has made me feel I’m not sure if it because of the fact that this really happened and I know how it feels to lose someone near to you or what, but I feel the ending of the story was unhappy for everyone and confusing also slightly upsetting because all of this could have been resolved and no one would have had to die if Zac’s older brother Just payed Truelove his money or If he didn’t threaten to hunt him down or tell him “I’m gonna hunt you down. I’m gonna hunt you down and then I’m gonna slit your throat and then I’m gonna cut you open and then I’M GONNA EAT YOUR MOTHERFUCKING HEART! YOU BETTER PRAY, JOHNNY YOU BETTER FUCKING PRAY THAT THE COPS FIND YOU BEFORE I DO! GET ON YOUR COCK SUCKING KNEES AND PRAY!”( although I would have had the same reaction if my brothers kidnapper called me) when Truelove called to let him know they were gonna let him go. It really left me hanging because I didn’t understand how Frankie ( the guy who watched and took care of him) could just basically become Zac’s best friend then tape him up and kill him. It had to have been heart wrenching for any mother or family to go through. Even for the brother, Jake Mazursky has to live with the fact that his little brother’s death is on him because he was a low life drug abuser. The book took me on all types of twist and turn good, bad, and ugly. I guess you can say the ending is appropriate for any kidnapping but very sad

PLOT TWIST

While reading the book “The Fault in Our Stars” I found it very predictable. Predictable to the point where I liked it. I felt I knew all that was coming and all that would happen. In the book both main characters Hazel Lancaster and Augustus Waters fell in love while the both  meeting at a teen cancer group. Lancaster having some sort of lung cancer since childhood and Waters Beating his cancer during his with the cost of his left leg (literally). While reading the book I felt it was obvious where I thought Author John Green was heading and boy was I highly upset and wrong. I believed deep in my heart Green would kill Lancaster of the lung fluid cancer she’s had for years. Instead He writes in that Her soulmate and love her life’s cancer was back and terminal. At this point in the book my heart twisted into knots and my mind spun into disbelief because Waters in this book was perceived as the golden boy of cancer patients and was in total shock it saddened me even more when Augustus broke the news to his love saying “I’ll fight it. I’ll fight it for you. Don’t you worry about me, Hazel Grace. I’m okay. I’ll find a way to hang around and annoy you for a long time.” on page 214. I felt Green made good move to keep readers interested but a terrible choice in how to. I was highly disappointed but wanted to read so much more

reading